| Ward's Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
| Argued January 18, 1989 Decided June 5, 1989 |
||||||
| Full case name | Wards Cove Packing Company, Incorporated, et al. v. Atonio, et al. | |||||
| Citations | 490 U.S. 642 (more) 109 S. Ct. 2115; 104 L. Ed. 2d 733; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 2794; 57 U.S.L.W. 4583; 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1519; 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P39,021 |
|||||
| Prior history | Reversed and remanded, 827 F.2d 439. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit, granted | |||||
| Subsequent history | 827 F.2d 439, reversed and remanded. | |||||
| Holding | ||||||
| To determine whether a disparate-impact case exists, compare racial composition of the at-issue jobs and the racial composition of the qualified population in the relevant labor market. | ||||||
| Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||
| Majority | White, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy | |||||
| Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Brennan, Marshall | |||||
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun | |||||
| Laws applied | ||||||
| Hazelwood School Dist. v. United States | ||||||
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio, 490 U.S. 642 (1989), was a court case argued before the United States Supreme Court on January 18, 1989. It concerned employment discrimination and was decided on June 5, 1989.
Contents |
A group of nonwhite cannery workers filed suit in District Court citing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 complaining that Wards Cove Packing Co. owner of Alaskan salmon canneries, was using discriminatory hiring practices that resulted in a large number of the skilled noncannery jobs to be filled by white workers and a large number of the unskilled cannery jobs to be filled by nonwhites. In this case the nonwhite workers were predominantly native Alaskans and Filipinos. The District Court case was found in favor of the defendants, Wards Cove Packing Co.
The Plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit which reversed the District Court decision stating the Petitioners, the Plaintiffs in the District Court, had made a prima facie case of disparate impact. The decision was based on statistics provided by the Petitioners that showed a high percentage of nonwhite workers in the cannery jobs and a low percentage of the noncannery jobs filled by nonwhite workers.
Wards Cove Packing Co. then appealed the Court of Appeals' ruling to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court determined that the Court of Appeals had erred by using inappropriate statistics and comparison. The majority determined that the proper comparison was to compare the percentage of nonwhite workers in noncannery jobs with the percentage of the available labor pool that were nonwhite and who had the appropriate skills to perform the noncannery jobs.
The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Court of Appeals with instructions to use the more appropriate comparison. Further if on remand the Respondents did establish a prima facie disparate-impact case the Petitioners would then need to "produce evidence of a legitimate business justification" for the hiring practices that created the disparity.
Soon after the decision Congress then Amended Title VII with the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to counter the Supreme Court's holding in Ward's Cove, thereby nullifying the case's precedent. The bill, in part, reads:
| “ | The purposes of this Act are-
|
” |
Works related to Wards Cove Packing Company Inc v. Atonio at Wikisource
|
||||||||||||||